 | ZimZalabim is a from England, UK. |
- http://www.thunderbolts.info/pdf/ElectricComet.pdf
 Mar 8, 5:20pm  (1 review) http://www.thunderbolts.info/pdf/Electri...-
Evidence Confirms Electric Comet Model
Clearly the worth of any scientific theory is based on its predictive ability, and in this respect the conventional 'dirty snowball' theory of comets currently championed by the scientific mainstream, which states they are giant balls of ice and dust, has failed miserably - both to predict, or even just convincingly accomodate, the torrent of new data gleaned from recent cometary research. To be blunt - the 'snowball' theory clearly appears to be wrong, and one doesn't need to be an accredited astronomer or astrophysicist to see it (on the contrary, that actually seems to be something of a handicap when it comes to an unbiased consideration of the evidence).
One simply needs (along with no better than reasonable eyesight - yes, really) a willingness to look at the evidence with an open mind, and to consider the likelihood that the electromagnetic force (which happens to be a 1000 billion billion billion billion times stronger than the force of gravity - that's 1 followed by 39 zeros) plays a much greater role in the large-scale universe than the majority of modern cosmologists seem willing to accept. For them only the force of gravity is significant, but this dogmatic viewpoint is becoming increasingly untenable as our telescopes and space probes continue to reveal phenomena and structure in the universe which leave the 'gravity-only' model floundering for explanations. If the electric comet model, which proposes that comets are really electricly charged rocky bodies undergoing glow discharge as they move through a radial electric field generated by the sun, is shown to be correct it will have extremely far-reaching and dire consequences for the 'standard (bigbang) model' of the universe. In fact it will sound its death knell no less - although the actual burial would likely be some time in coming.
It appears that predictions made by Wal Thornhill and the Electric Comet model are being quickly confirmed, whether mainstream astronomers like it or not. In the end, it seems nature will be the arbiter of which theory is the most accurate and predictive.
This pdf file concisely summarises the latest evidence and clearly contrasts the predictive success of the electric model with the embarassing failure of the 'snowball' theory. Judge their relative merits for yourself.
"We have now had four close [space probe] encounters with comets, and every one of them has thrown astronomers onto their back foot" - NewScientist, Sept 2005
"The remarkable properties of comets are not even remotely explicable by any of the numerous ad hoc assumptions of `modern' comet theory." - R A Lyttleton, FRS, Journey to the Centre of Uncertainty, Speculations in Science & Technology.
"Almost the entire body of astronomers can go wrong in a way that, in later years, seems absurd. To hear scientists talk today, you would think the first moment in human history in which nonsensical views are not widely held is now." - Fred Hoyle, Astronomer
"I have a lot of trouble with the academic world, the same as I do with the bible belt, it's the same kind of trouble. It's because they get a picture of this world which they are sure is right and they hang on to it for all they're worth". - John Dobson, Telescope Designer
"The amateurs tend to be more broad-minded than the people who have to earn their keep by being narrow-minded" - John Dobson,
|
